When my writing team and I started working with New York to develop the EngageNY English language arts curriculum for grades 9-12, we started with the standards themselves—they are the backbone of the curriculum. We then considered each of the texts selected for the curriculum, asking, “How can we organically address the standards based on this text? Which standards seem inherent in the text?” Based on the focal standards and texts, we developed assessments and worked backward from there to design instruction and learning experiences.
As we worked, we saw that a lot of publishers identified their materials as “Common Core-aligned,” which typically meant that existing materials had been retrofitted to the standards. Our team, on the other hand, was developing curriculum from the standards up in a way that had not been done before. To clarify the distinction, we stopped calling our work for EngageNY a “Common Core-aligned curriculum” and started calling it simply “a Common Core curriculum.”
The EngageNY curriculum includes four modules per year. We completed the final module for 12th grade last summer. To other states or districts looking to undertake a similar curriculum development project, I would give the following advice:
All of these ideas are nice in theory, and when they are realized, they have great potential to positively impact what happens in the classroom. Here’s what’s happening in classrooms across New York and in other states using the EngageNY curriculum: Teachers are letting the students do the work. They are stepping back so that in a discussion, the students aren’t talking to the teacher, they’re talking to each other. When students are doing research, they’re following their own leads. Teachers are not teaching a text—they are teaching students the skills and content embedded in the standards via the text. They are giving students tools, not information. They are giving students time and space to think and to build their own knowledge and understandings.
As a former high school English teacher, I wanted the curriculum to give the standards life so that the teachers using them could incorporate the new standards into instruction with as little disruption as possible. A thoughtfully developed curriculum that models the instructional shifts allows teachers to focus on their students as they internalize new ways of teaching or refine aspects of their current practice. Our intention at PCG Education was to provide a resource for teachers that makes possible these ways of teaching and learning, and that’s really what the EngageNY curriculum is all about.